Quantifier Raising is often considered to be a relatively local operation, though it has been argued that nonlocal applications are licensed by generating new scope interpretations (Fox 2000, Reinhart 2006) or resolving antecedent-contained deletions (Fox 2002, Wilder 2003, Cecchetto 2004). In this article, an account of the restricted distribution of sloppy pronouns in antecedent-contained deletions leads to the conclusion that exceptional applications of Quantifier Raising are in fact not licensed purely by virtue of QR’s escaping the antecedent for ellipsis.

中文翻译：

---

关于量词提升经济学的一点评论

尽管有人争论说非本地应用程序是通过生成新的作用域解释（Fox 2000，Reinhart 2006）或解决先前包含的删除操作（Fox 2002，Wilder 2003，Cecchetto 2004）获得许可的，但通常认为Quantifier Raising是一个相对本地的操作。 。在本文中，对先行词所含缺失中草率代词的有限分布的解释导致了这样一个结论，即实际上并非仅由于QR避开了省略号而使Quantifier Raising的特殊应用获得了许可。