当前位置: X-MOL 学术Law and Development Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Has it Reinvented Iron Law? South Africa’s Social Industrialisation, not Iron Industrialisation
Law and Development Review ( IF 0.4 ) Pub Date : 2018-06-26 , DOI: 10.1515/ldr-2018-0027
T. K. Pooe

Abstract This paper examines whether the current South African legal framework and subsequent policies post-1994 encourage and have emphatically fostered industrialisation in South Africa primarily and Southern Africa more generally. The primary contention of this paper is that the South African State, unlike fellow Southern African States, has a long history with industrialisation and should have laid the foundations for Southern Africa’s large scale industrialisation trajectory. However, the post-1994 government vision for South Africa has never had a Law and Development philosophy that prioritises and fosters industrialisation. Industrial Promotion in Africa, is understood as being concerned with drafting, strategically implementing and investing in industrially minded action plans. Through the prism of Local Economic Development policy and legislation in the Sedibeng region, this paper contends that industrialisation is still a farfetched endeavour despite industrially minded policies like the New Growth Path and the Industrial Policy Action Plans in South Africa. Moreover, South Africa’s industrialisation agenda is compromised by the Law and Development philosophy of the African National Congress led government. At the core of this philosophy is an overestimation of social justice activity like Human Rights promotion at the expense of Asian Developmental States’ non-human rights approach to economic development activity, like industrialisation in rural and township regions of South Africa.

中文翻译:

它重塑了铁法吗?南非的社会工业化,而不是钢铁工业化

摘要本文探讨了当前的南非法律框架和1994年后的后续政策是否在主要在南非以及更广泛的南部非洲鼓励并着重促进了工业化。本文的主要论点是,南非国家与南部非洲国家不同,它具有悠久的工业化历史,应该为南部非洲的大规模工业化发展奠定基础。但是,1994年后政府对南非的愿景从来没有一个优先考虑和促进工业化的法律与发展哲学。非洲的工业促进被理解为与起草,战略实施和投资于具有工业意识的行动计划有关。通过塞迪本地区地方经济发展政策和立法的棱镜,本文认为,尽管采取了具有工业头脑的政策,如《新增长路径》和《南非工业政策行动计划》,工业化仍是一项艰巨的努力。此外,南非国民议会领导的政府的法律与发展理念损害了南非的工业化议程。这种哲学的核心是高估了社会正义活动,例如促进人权,却损害了亚洲发展国家对经济发展活动的非人权方法,如南非农村和乡镇地区的工业化。本文认为,尽管采取了具有工业头脑的政策,如《新增长路径》和《南非工业政策行动计划》,工业化仍是一项艰巨的努力。此外,南非国民议会领导的政府的法律与发展理念损害了南非的工业化议程。这种哲学的核心是高估了社会正义活动,例如促进人权,却损害了亚洲发展国家对经济发展活动的非人权方针,如南非农村和乡镇地区的工业化。本文认为,尽管采取了具有工业头脑的政策,如《新增长路径》和《南非工业政策行动计划》,工业化仍是一项艰巨的努力。此外,南非国民议会领导的政府的法律与发展理念损害了南非的工业化议程。这种哲学的核心是高估了社会正义活动,例如促进人权,却损害了亚洲发展国家对经济发展活动的非人权方针,如南非农村和乡镇地区的工业化。南非国民议会领导的政府的法律与发展理念损害了南非的工业化议程。这种哲学的核心是高估了社会正义活动,例如促进人权,却损害了亚洲发展国家对经济发展活动的非人权方法,如南非农村和乡镇地区的工业化。南非国民议会领导的政府的法律与发展理念损害了南非的工业化议程。这种哲学的核心是高估了社会正义活动,例如促进人权,却损害了亚洲发展国家对经济发展活动的非人权方针,如南非农村和乡镇地区的工业化。
更新日期:2018-06-26
down
wechat
bug