Abstract Hegel argues that Kant’s antinomies of pure reason are important because they implicitly show the categories of thought to be contradictory. In so doing Hegel disregards much of what interests Kant about the antinomies and interprets the latter “against Kant’s intention”. He also gets Kant wrong when he claims that Kant’s “trivial” resolution of the antinomies simply shifts contradiction from things in themselves to appearances. Nonetheless, I contend that Hegel’s interpretation is defensible, insofar as the antinomies do, indeed, show (what Hegel regards as) the categories of the “infinite” and the “finite” to be both opposed to and inseparable from one another. I also argue that Hegel is right to maintain that Kant’s proofs of the theses and antitheses in the antinomies assume what they are meant to prove and that Kant’s resolution of the antinomies is unsatisfactory.

中文翻译：

---

黑格尔，康德和纯粹理性的对立面

摘要黑格尔认为，康德的纯理性定律很重要，因为它们隐含地表明了思想范畴是矛盾的。黑格尔这样做无视了康德对反义律的大部分兴趣，并解释了后者“违背康德的意图”。当他声称康德对矛盾的“平凡”解决只是将矛盾从自身的事物转移到外表时，他也弄错了康德。尽管如此，我认为黑格尔的解释是可以辩驳的，因为确实存在对立论，表明黑格尔认为什么是“无限”和“有限”的范畴是相互对立和不可分割的。