Abstract I have two main goals in this paper. The first is to argue for the thesis that Kant gave up on his highest good argument for the existence of God around 1800. The second is to revive a dialogue about this thesis that died out in the 1960s. The paper is divided into three sections. In the first, I reconstruct Kant’s highest good argument. In the second, I turn to the post-1800 convolutes of Kant’s Opus postumum to discuss his repeated claim that there is only one way to argue for the existence of God, a way which resembles the highest good argument only in taking the moral law as its starting point. In the third, I explain why I do not find the counterarguments to my thesis introduced in the 1960s persuasive.

中文翻译：

---

康德（Kant）在1800年后拒绝承认存在上帝的最高良论

摘要我有两个主要目标。首先是争辩康德在1800年左右放弃关于上帝存在的最高论据的论点。其次是复兴关于在1960年代灭亡的这一论点的对话。本文分为三个部分。首先，我重构康德的最高论据。在第二篇中，我将讨论康德的作品《 1800年后的混乱》，讨论他反复提出的主张只有一种方法来主张上帝的存在，这种方法类似于最高的善辩，只是以道德律为依据。它的起点。在第三部分中，我解释了为什么我没有找到与1960年代有说服力的论文相反的观点。