Abstract This study reflects upon the fundamental justification of the radicality of Kant’s affirmation according to which religion is “a matter of reason alone”. To this end, this paper bores in two directions: In a first direction, the premises as well as the context of the Critique of Practical Reason’s thesis, according to which the moral law leads to religion, are reconstructed. The question that needs to be clarified in this context concerns the semantic content of the concept of religion that is introduced here in Kant’s argumentation. That question’s resolution will help to show the sense in which religion is not merely a matter of reason alone. In a second direction, further inquiries are made regarding Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone on the ‘plural relation’ between two discourses that originate in different sources – reason and revelation. This shows the sense in which revealed religion enriches reason’s discourse. In that respect, the complexity of the Kantian arguments does not allow us to maintain outright the thesis that religion is a matter of reason alone.

中文翻译：

---

宗教大本营“ purement une affaire de raison”？

摘要这项研究反映了康德断言的根本性依据，根据该论断，宗教是“一个理性的问题”。为此，本文有两个方面的研究：在第一个方向上，重构了实践理性批判的前提和语境，根据该前提和情境，道德律引向了宗教。在这种情况下需要澄清的问题涉及在康德的论证中引入的宗教概念的语义内容。该问题的解决将有助于表明宗教不仅仅是一种理性问题。在第二个方向 关于在理性范围内的宗教，人们进一步询问了源自不同来源的两种话语之间的“复数关系”，即理性和启示。这显示了揭示的宗教丰富了理性话语的感觉。在这方面，康德论证的复杂性使我们不能完全坚持这样一个论点，即宗教仅是理性问题。