This article concerns a moment in French intellectual history when the self-evidences of structuralism become doubtful under the pressure exerted by discourse; it thus treats a second turn within the linguistic turn as it occurred in France. The work of Emile Benveniste, and texts by Jean-Francois Lyotard and Paul Ricoeur, flesh out this development. I use them, as well as John Searle’s response, to approach anew Derrida’s essay “Signature Event Context.” Derrida’s distance from this second linguistic turn thereby becomes visible (including from Lacan’s, Barthes’, and Foucault’s versions of it), and the distinct status of discourse in Derrida’s own thought emerges. Finally, critiquing Derrida’s folding of discourse into a notion of “signifying form” in SEC, while drawing on his account there of “citationality,” I sketch new directions for conceiving of context and discourse themselves, ones arguably able to withstand Derrida’s express concerns.

中文翻译：

---

“'签名事件上下文'。。。在上下文中”

本文关注的是法国知识史上的一个时刻，在话语施加的压力下，结构主义的自证变得令人怀疑。因此，它对待在法国发生的语言转向中的第二转向。Emile Benveniste的著作以及Jean-Francois Lyotard和Paul Ricoeur的著作充实了这一发展。我使用它们以及约翰·塞尔（John Searle）的回应来重新处理德里达的论文“签名事件上下文”。德里达到第二种语言转向的距离由此可见（包括拉康，巴特和福柯的版本），话语在德里达自己的思想中的独特地位浮出水面。最后，在德里达（Derida）的论述中，他引用了德里达（Derida）的论述，将其折叠为“象征形式”的概念，