ABSTRACT:This article provides a rejoinder to recent historical accounts which trace the origins of international human rights to the work of conservative Christians writing in the 1930s and 1940s. Focusing on the French Catholics usually identified as the architects of Christian human rights theory, I argue that this was neither a unified project, nor an unambiguously conservative one. Instead, I stress the political ambivalence of Christian human rights discourse—the way it defied distinctions between right and left, or liberal and conservative.

中文翻译：

---

基督教人权的神学与政治

摘要：本文对最近的历史记载进行了反驳，这些记载将国际人权的起源追溯到 1930 年代和 1940 年代保守派基督徒的著作。关注通常被认为是基督教人权理论建筑师的法国天主教徒，我认为这既不是一个统一的项目，也不是一个明确的保守项目。相反，我强调基督教人权话语的政治矛盾——它无视右派和左派，或自由派和保守派之间的区别。