当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of the History of Ideas › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Archives, Thresholds, Discontinuities: Blumenberg and Foucault on Historical Substantialism and the Phenomenology of History
Journal of the History of Ideas ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2019-01-01 , DOI: 10.1353/jhi.2019.0007
Jean-Claude Monod

Abstract:Blumenberg's The Legitimacy of the Modern Age was published in the same year as Foucault's The Order of Things (1966). Both books attempt to grasp certain not altogether self-evident changes in the Western history of knowledge and attempt new methods of considering these discontinuities and the so-called "thresholds" between epochs. Beyond such general points of shared interest, one must ask if Blumenberg and Foucault share other intellectual features, for they both developed strong philosophical critiques of Husserlian and Heideggerian approaches to history, critiques that arose from their shared hostility to a kind of "historicism," alongside their refusal of any "substance."

中文翻译:

档案、阈值、不连续性:布卢门伯格和福柯关于历史实体主义和历史现象学

摘要:布卢门伯格的《现代的合法性》与福柯的《事物的秩序》(1966)同年出版。这两本书都试图抓住西方知识史中某些不完全不言自明的变化,并尝试新的方法来考虑这些不连续性和时代之间的所谓“阈值”。除了这些普遍的共同兴趣点之外,人们必须问布卢门伯格和福柯是否具有其他知识分子特征,因为他们都对胡塞尔和海德格尔的历史方法进行了强烈的哲学批判,这些批判源于他们对某种“历史主义”的共同敌意,伴随着他们拒绝任何“物质”。
更新日期:2019-01-01
down
wechat
bug