What metaphysical account of human nature best makes sense of T.F. Torrance’s doctrine of atonement? Here I argue that the account that best makes sense of Torrance’s doctrine of atonement is one in which Christ instantiates an abstract universal human nature and the rest of humanity participates in an abstract universal human nature. In defending this thesis, I examine Torrance’s doctrine of atonement and his use of the anhypostasia – enhypostasia distinction. I conclude by defending the significance of the an-enhypostasia distinction for abstract universal theories of Christ’s human nature.

中文翻译：

---

一与多

什么对人性的形而上学解释最能理解 TF Torrance 的赎罪教义？在这里，我认为最能理解托兰斯赎罪教义的说法是，基督将抽象的普遍人性具体化，而其余的人类参与抽象的普遍人性。在为这篇论文辩护时，我检查了托兰斯的赎罪教义以及他对 anhypostasia – enhypostasia 区别的使用。最后，我捍卫了关于基督人性的抽象普遍理论的 an-enhypostasia 区别的重要性。