In this paper I discuss whether Neo-Confucianism in the Chosŏn dynasty can be interpreted as a branch of the Cheng-Zhu school of Neo-Confucianism. Against the popular interpretation that Korean Neo-Confucianism is essentially a product of the Cheng-Zhu school, I argue that it can be understood better in terms of the more diverse perspectives and developments of Confucianism proper. Yi I’s philosophy, for example, can be understood more consistently from the perspectives of Zhang Zai, Hu Hong, Luo Qinshun, or even Xunzi.

中文翻译：

---

朝鲜新儒学是否属于承朱学派？：从易一（1538-1584）的哲学传统重新思考朝鲜的思想史

在本文中，我讨论了朝鲜王朝的新儒学是否可以解释为新儒学程朱学派的一个分支。反对韩国新儒学本质上是程朱学派的流行解释，我认为，从儒学本身更多样化的观点和发展来看，可以更好地理解它。例如，从张载、胡洪、罗勤顺甚至荀子的角度，可以更一致地理解易一的哲学。