The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate by text and empirical facts, the need to reform the rules in force.,This study confronts current standards with empirical facts. To do this, it is postulated that even though current market access standards are better that the Gatt 1947 rules, they leave the possibility for some members to hijack them to eventually increase their protection effective tariff.,Market access standards for agricultural products should be reformed because of their asymmetry. To put an end to this asymmetry, these standards should be rebalanced. This is precisely the challenge of the current multilateral negotiations.,Unlike the studies conducted on this subject (to my knowledge), which are mainly based on economic or political science methods, this analysis is essentially based on legal reasoning law.

中文翻译：

---

农业市场准入规则的必要改革

本文的目的是通过文本和经验事实来说明改革现行规则的必要性。本研究以经验事实来面对当前的标准。为此，假定即使当前的市场准入标准优于Gatt 1947的规定，但它们仍使某些成员可以劫持它们以最终提高其保护有效关税的可能性。应改革农产品的市场准入标准由于它们的不对称性。为了消除这种不对称，应该重新平衡这些标准。这恰恰是当前多边谈判的挑战。不同于（据我所知）对此主题进行的研究（主要基于经济或政治科学方法），该分析基本上基于法律推理法。