Martin Heidegger’s writings on modern science as well as his stray remarks on communication are important theoretical resources to understand the character and contour of, and our response to the Anthropocene epoch. John Caputo distinguishes between the early hermeneutic account of science in Heidegger’s corpus and the later deconstructive account, claiming that the former would have sufficed to fulfil the critical task of the latter without its pejorative and dismissive reading of modern science. Accepting Caputo’s distinction but rejecting his critique of the deconstructive account, this paper argues that Heidegger’s abandoning of the hermeneutic account was premised on the refusal of the Western metaphysical baggage that still pervades and is endorsed in that account, a baggage which is now leading to the Anthropocene epoch and the consequent ontological communication of distress. The deconstructive approach evokes the communication of scientific phenomena in plural ways such as fictional, poetical and metaphorical narratives, thus undercutting the reductionist and monolithic character of modern science.

中文翻译：

---

海德格尔与现代科学：人类时代对本体传播的回应

马丁·海德格尔（Martin Heidegger）的现代科学著作以及他对交流的流言mark语是重要的理论资源，有助于理解人类的特征和轮廓以及我们对人类世的时代的反应。约翰·卡普托（John Caputo）区分了海德格尔语料库中的早期科学解释学解释和后来的解构性解释，声称前者在没有对现代科学的贬义和轻描淡写的前提下就足以完成后者的关键任务。本文接受了卡普托的区别，但拒绝了他对解构主义帐户的批评，因此认为海德格尔放弃诠释学帐户的前提是拒绝仍然存在并得到该帐户认可的西方形而上学行李，现在导致人类世时代和随之而来的遇险本体通信的行李。解构主义方法以多种方式唤起了科学现象的传播，例如虚构的，诗歌的和隐喻的叙事，从而削弱了现代科学的还原论和整体性。