The problem of synthesis and reconciliation of the Ramanuja and Sirhindi is of vital significance and importance, and no serious student of comparative philosophy can deliberately neglect it. Epistemologically speaking, these two philosophers have been forced to tackle the same problem(s), and in solving them, their methods and hypotheses have been noticeably similar. The emphasis of this paper is to recognize, highlight, and compare the aspects valued in Ramanuja’s epistemological views with those of the Sirhindi. I will also discuss the basic postulates of Ramanuja and Sirhindi’s epistemology and underline certain epistemological approaches to knowledge and justification for formulating the arguments to find out new dimensions in outlining their fundamental epistemological positions. This paper explores certain elements in the identities of these two philosophers and attempts to demonstrate a thread of continuity, especially with regard to their methods and thoughts. This paper also brings out a brief critical account of their epistemological views.

拉曼努贾和西林迪的综合与和解问题具有至关重要的意义和重要性，没有一个比较哲学的认真研究者可以故意忽略它。从认识论上讲，这两个哲学家被迫解决相同的问题，并且在解决这些问题时，他们的方法和假设都非常相似。本文的重点是要认识，突出并比较拉玛努贾认识论观点和西林迪观点中所重视的方面。我还将讨论拉马努贾和西林迪的认识论的基本假设，并强调某些认识论的知识方法和论据，以便提出论点以找出概述其基本认识论立场的新维度。本文探讨了这两位哲学家身份中的某些要素，并试图证明其连续性，特别是在他们的方法和思想方面。本文还简要概述了他们的认识论观点。