A recurrent statement when implementation of international orders/recommendations in individual cases is considered is the belief that greater specificity of the measures helps compliance. Thne article studies the validity of this statement in light of the processes and dynamics that occur when a decision or judgment is adopted by a supranational body. The article analyses, through specific case studies, and a case tracing process, if specificity impacted upon de domestic responsiveness towards it, and if so, how. We also considered the extent to which supranational bodies deferred to states the design of appropriate reparations and how subsidiarity applied. The article is mainly based on an analysis of decision by the Inter-American and African Human Rights Systems as well as by decision taken by some UN treaty monitoring bodies like the Human Rights Committee.

中文翻译：

---

平衡赔偿措施的特殊性和国家加强实施的自由裁量权

在考虑在个别情况下实施国际命令/建议时，经常出现的一种说法是认为措施的更大程度有助于遵守。这篇文章根据超国家机构通过决定或判断时发生的过程和动态研究了这一陈述的有效性。本文通过具体案例研究和案例追踪过程分析了特殊性是否影响了国内对它的响应，如果是，如何影响。我们还考虑了超国家机构在多大程度上推迟了国家适当赔偿的设计以及附属性如何适用。