Abstract Purpose The main goal of this study is to outline and analyze the Danish adoption and translation of the Norwegian Publication Indicator. Design/methodology/approach The study takes the form of a policy analysis mainly drawing on document analysis of policy papers, previously published studies and grey literature. Findings The study highlights a number of crucial factors that relate both to the Danish process and to the final Danish result underscoring that the Danish BFI model is indeed a quite different system than its Norwegian counterpart. One consequence of these process- and design differences is the fact that the broader legitimacy of the Danish BFI today appears to be quite poor. Reasons for this include: unclear and shifting objectives throughout the process; limited willingness to take ownership of the model among stakeholders; lack of communication throughout the implementation process and an apparent underestimation of the challenges associated with the use of bibliometric indicators. Research limitation The conclusions of the study are based on the authors’ interpretation of a long drawn and complex process with many different stakeholders involved. The format of this article does not allow for a detailed documentation of all elements, but further details can be provided upon request. Practical implications The analysis may feed into current policy discussions on the future of the Danish BFI. Originality/value Some elements of the present analysis have previously been published in Danish outlets, but this article represents the first publication on this issue targeting a broader international audience.

中文翻译：

---

丹麦基于绩效的研究资金：挪威模式的采用和翻译

摘要目的本研究的主要目的是概述和分析丹麦语对挪威出版指标的采用和翻译。设计/方法/方法本研究采取政策分析的形式，主要依靠政策文件，先前发表的研究和灰色文献的文件分析。研究结果强调了与丹麦进程和最终丹麦结果有关的许多关键因素，强调丹麦BFI模型的确与挪威的模型完全不同。这些工艺和设计差异的结果之一是，如今丹麦BFI的更广泛的合法性似乎很差。造成这种情况的原因包括：在整个过程中目标不明确且不断变化；在利益相关者中拥有模型所有权的意愿有限；在整个实施过程中缺乏沟通，并且明显低估了与使用文献计量指标相关的挑战。研究局限性研究结论是基于作者对一个涉及许多不同利益相关者的长期而复杂的过程的解释。本文的格式不允许所有元素的详细文档，但是可以根据要求提供更多详细信息。实际意义该分析可能会涉及当前有关丹麦BFI未来的政策讨论。独创性/价值本分析的某些内容以前已经在丹麦的媒体上发表过，但本文代表了针对此问题的第一份出版物，针对的是更广泛的国际受众。