There is growing acknowledgement of the need to address the impacts of conflict-related sexual violence (CRSV), with less recognition of conflict-related reproductive and maternal harms and children born of war (CBW). An intricate set of common as well as distinctive interests arise for both victims/survivors and their children that remain unfulfilled. National Action Plans on Women, Peace and Security (NAPs-WPS) present an opportunity to redress these gaps. This article examines to what extent are NAPs-WPS responsive to the specific rights and gendered interests of victims/survivors of CRSV and their children? It advances thinking on gender planning for peace and security and makes three significant analytical contributions: a ‘Typology of Impacts and Losses’ advancing understanding of CRSV; a ‘Gender Interests Analysis’ framework, identifying the practical and strategic gender interests of victims/survivors and their children; and application of these frameworks to produce a critical analysis of the NAPs-WPS of Indonesia, Nepal, Philippines and Timor-Leste. It finds that planning under WPS is failing to ensure that multi-sectoral services are available, while reproductive and maternity issues and CBW are completely neglected in the selected NAPs-WPS. The article discusses the implications of these findings for gender planning through NAPs-WPS going forward.

中文翻译：

---

通过国家妇女、和平与安全行动计划解决与冲突有关的性暴力受害者/幸存者及其子女的性别利益

人们越来越认识到需要解决与冲突有关的性暴力 (CRSV) 的影响，而对与冲突有关的生殖和孕产危害以及战争所生儿童 (CBW) 的认识较少。受害者/幸存者及其子女都有一系列错综复杂的共同利益和独特利益，但仍未实现。妇女、和平与安全国家行动计划 (NAPs-WPS) 为弥补这些差距提供了机会。本文探讨了 NAPs-WPS 在多大程度上响应了 CRSV 受害者/幸存者及其子女的特定权利和性别利益？它促进了对和平与安全的性别规划的思考，并做出了三项重要的分析贡献：“影响和损失的类型学”促进了对 CRSV 的理解；“性别利益分析”框架，确定受害者/幸存者及其子女的实际和战略性性别利益；和应用这些框架对印度尼西亚、尼泊尔、菲律宾和东帝汶的 NAPs-WPS 进行批判性分析。它发现 WPS 下的规划未能确保提供多部门服务，而在选定的 NAPs-WPS 中完全忽略了生殖和生育问题以及 CBW。本文讨论了这些发现对通过 NAPs-WPS 进行的性别规划的影响。而在选定的 NAPs-WPS 中完全忽略了生殖和生育问题以及 CBW。本文讨论了这些发现对通过 NAPs-WPS 进行的性别规划的影响。而在选定的 NAPs-WPS 中完全忽略了生殖和生育问题以及 CBW。本文讨论了这些发现对通过 NAPs-WPS 进行的性别规划的影响。