当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
‘Dagon Our God’: Iron i Philistine Cult in Text and Archaeology
Journal of Ancient Near Eastern Religions ( IF 0.3 ) Pub Date : 2016-06-04 , DOI: 10.1163/15692124-12341278
Jeffrey P. Emanuel 1
Affiliation  

Despite the late date and dubious veracity of the Deuteronomistic history, and despite the Bible’s status as the only Bronze or Iron Age text which indisputably refers to Dagon in a southern Canaanite geographical context, scholars have traditionally accepted 1 Samuel 5:1–8’s portrayal of Philistine cult in the Iron Age i as being centered on this deity and his temple at Ashdod. This study marshals archaeological and historical evidence to assess the level of support for the presence of Dagon in Iron i Philistia, and for a temple at Ashdod as described in the biblical account. Also considered, through comparison with the materially analogous situation in the Bronze Age Aegean, is the critical role that a textual complement to physical evidence (or, in the case of the Philistines, the lack thereof) plays in cultic analysis and pantheonic reconstruction.



中文翻译:

“达贡我们的上帝”:文本和考古学中的铁我非利士崇拜

尽管氘核历史上的日期较晚且真实性令人怀疑,并且尽管圣经的地位是唯一的青铜时代或铁器时代文本,但在迦南南部地理环境中无可争议地提及达贡,但学者们传统上还是接受撒母耳记5:1-8铁器时代我的非利士崇拜以这个神和他在阿什杜德的庙宇为中心。这项研究乘警考古和历史证据,以评估的支持水平衮在铁的存在非利士人,以及在圣经记载中描述的阿什杜德神庙。通过与青铜时代爱琴海的实质类似情况进行比较,还认为,文本证据对物证的补充(或在非利士人的情况下缺乏)在文化分析和泛神论重建中起着至关重要的作用。

更新日期:2016-06-04
down
wechat
bug