The most recent discussions concerned with Rewritten Scripture compositions have been dominated by different views on whether or not it is plausible to subsume such texts within a single genre. While some scholars are convinced that we can only talk of a literary strategy, others hold that genre classification is applicable. Anders Klostergaard Petersen recently introduced the distinction between emic and etic perspectives into the debate, while denying plausibility of the former when Rewritten Scripture compositions are considered in terms of genre. The present article attempts to argue that the emic perspective can plausibly be applied in the case of Rewritten Scripture studies, representing a useful heuristic device.

中文翻译：

---

重写圣经的分类。保留主题观点的呼吁

关于改写圣经作品的最新讨论一直被关于是否将这样的文本归入单一流派的不同观点所主导。尽管有些学者相信我们只能谈论一种文学策略，但另一些学者则认为体裁分类是适用的。安德斯·克洛斯特加德·彼得森（Anders Klostergaard Petersen）最近在辩论中引入了母体观点与主观观点之间的区别，但在以体裁角度考虑重写圣经作品时却否认了前者的合理性。本文试图证明，emic观点可以合理地应用于重写圣经研究的情况下，代表了一种有用的启发式手段。