The problem of demarcating science from nonscience remains unsolved. This article executes an analytical process of elimination of different demarcation proposals put forward since the professionalization of the philosophy of science, explaining why each of those proposals is unsatisfactory or incomplete. Then, it elaborates on how to execute an alternative multicriterial scientific demarcation project put forward by Mahner (2007, 521–522; 2013, 29–43). This project allows for the demarcation not only of science from non-science and from pseudoscience, but also of different types of sciences and of scientific fields (e.g., formal sciences, natural sciences, social sciences) from each other. This article also offers arguments in favor of accepting two types of scientific demarcations, namely epistemic-warrant scientific demarcations and territorial scientific demarcations, and argues in favor of accepting a territorially broad scientific demarcation.

中文翻译：

---

标界问题的多标准方法

区分科学与非科学的问题仍未解决。本文执行了一个消除自科学哲学专业化以来提出的不同划界建议的分析过程，解释了为什么这些建议中的每一个都不令人满意或不完整。然后，详细阐述了如何执行 Mahner (2007, 521-522; 2013, 29-43) 提出的替代性多标准科学划界项目。该项目不仅可以区分科学与非科学和伪科学，还可以区分不同类型的科学和科学领域（例如，形式科学、自然科学、社会科学）。本文还提供了支持接受两种科学划分的论据，