Abstract:T. S. Eliot's teaching notes, made when he taught Joyce's work to a class at Harvard University in 1933, provide the substance for a re-reading of the Eliot-Joyce relationship. This essay shows that the way in which Eliot taught Ulysses and A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man to undergraduates in the early 1930s provides compelling and detailed evidence of two substantial changes in his views of Joyce in the decade since "Ulysses, Order and Myth." First, the Harvard teaching notes reveal an Eliot who is determinedly personal, even emotional, in his reading. Second, Eliot now presents Joyce as a Catholic writer, and so the teaching notes represent a significant and previously unrecognized step in the long-running "Catholic question" in Joyce studies. In this respect, the notes provide fascinating preparations for Eliot's 1934 After Strange Gods. The significance of this shift in Eliot's appraisal of Joyce lies, I argue, not in the validity of Eliot's new opinions but in the need for Joyce studies to heed the religious contexts within which Joyce's work has been read.

中文翻译：

---

TS 艾略特对詹姆斯乔伊斯的看法：哈佛教学笔记

摘要：TS 艾略特 1933 年在哈佛大学的一个班上教授乔伊斯的作品时所做的教学笔记，为重新阅读艾略特与乔伊斯的关系提供了素材。这篇文章表明，艾略特在 1930 年代初期向本科生教授《尤利西斯》和《青年艺术家的肖像》的方式提供了令人信服和详细的证据，证明自“尤利西斯、秩序和神话。” 首先，哈佛的教学笔记揭示了艾略特在阅读时非常个人化，甚至情感化。其次，艾略特现在将乔伊斯描述为一位天主教作家，因此教学笔记代表了乔伊斯研究中长期存在的“天主教问题”中一个重要且以前未被承认的步骤。在这方面，这些笔记为艾略特 1934 年的《异神之后》提供了引人入胜的准备。我认为，艾略特对乔伊斯评价的这种转变的意义不在于艾略特新观点的有效性，而在于乔伊斯研究需要注意阅读乔伊斯作品的宗教背景。