Building upon a slew of studies in the past 30 years on intertextuality and the literary reuse of biblical traditions, Jeremy Corley, Geoffrey Miller, and their contributors turn their attention to a large and important body of early Jewish literature often categorized as deuterocanonical. Dedicated to the memory of Alexander Di Lella, the book is the outcome of critical discussions at the Deuterocanonical Books Continuing Seminar of the Catholic Biblical Association of America. The 13 essays in this volume address a broad array of lingering questions on intertextuality, using the deuterocanonical works as an organizing body of evidence. The book has a number of critical aims: (1) to propose a methodological distinction between authorand reader-oriented intertextuality, with a noticeable tilt toward a preference for author-centred approaches; (2) to evaluate criteria for determining an instance of reuse by an ancient author; and (3) to incorporate early Jewish literature into a larger discussion of intertextuality in Jewish and Christian antiquity, treating the deuterocanonical works as a type literary corpus. The contributions of this volume are a rich repository of thorough textual reasoning and careful methodological reflection in a particular vein (building largely from Benjamin Sommer and Dennis MacDonald, but also reaching back to Michael Fishbane and literary critics like Ben Porat and Kristeva). Following a lengthy exposition of the volume’s main points in the form an editorial introduction, the first set of essays examine the role of Jewish scriptural works and their texts in the composition and interpretation of deuterocanonical works, a section entitled ‘Looking to the Past.’ These essays want to know how the use of the Old Testament in the deuterocanonical works informed their shape and message. There are essentially two types of essays in this book, with some necessary line blurring, and this section is no different. It contains first a number of contributions that are primarily observational and data gathering, describing the variegated ways that the authors of the deuterocanonical works referenced and made use of antecedent scriptural traditions from Jewish scripture. Corley’s article, for example, catalogues references to Abraham, Moses, and David in Tobit, Ben Sira, 1–2 Maccabees, Judith, Baruch, 912555 ITQ0010.1177/0021140020912555Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-reviews2020

中文翻译：

---

书评：Deuterocanonical 和同源文学的互文探索

基于过去 30 年间关于互文性和圣经传统文学再利用的大量研究，Jeremy Corley、Geoffrey Miller 和他们的贡献者将注意力转向了大量重要的早期犹太文学，这些文献通常被归类为 deuterocanonical。为了纪念亚历山大·迪莱拉，这本书是美国天主教圣经协会 Deuterocanonical Books Continuing Seminar 批判性讨论的结果。本卷中的 13 篇文章使用 deuterocanonical 作品作为组织的证据，解决了一系列关于互文性的挥之不去的问题。这本书有几个关键目标：（1）提出作者和读者导向的互文之间的方法论区别，明显倾向于以作者为中心的方法；(2) 评估古代作者重用实例的判断标准；(3) 将早期的犹太文学纳入对犹太和基督教古代互文性的更大讨论中，将后世正典作品视为一种类型的文学语料库。本卷的贡献是一个丰富的资料库，其中包含以特定方式进行的彻底文本推理和仔细的方法论反思（主要来自本杰明·索默（Benjamin Sommer）和丹尼斯·麦克唐纳（Dennis MacDonald），但也可以追溯到迈克尔·菲什班（Michael Fishbane）和文学评论家（如本·波拉特和克里斯蒂娃））。在以社论引言的形式对该卷的主要观点进行了冗长的阐述之后，第一组文章考察了犹太圣经作品及其文本在二次正典作品的构成和解释中的作用，这一部分名为“回顾过去”。' 这些文章想知道在申述经典著作中旧约的使用是如何形成它们的形式和信息的。这本书基本上有两种类型的文章，有一些必要的线条模糊，这部分也不例外。它首先包含一些主要是观察和数据收集的贡献，描述了deuterocanonical 作品的作者引用和利用犹太经典中的先行经典传统的各种方式。例如，Corley 的文章在 Tobit, Ben Sira, 1–2 Maccabees, Judith, Baruch, 912555 ITQ0010.1177/0021140020912555Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-reviews2020 中编录了对亚伯拉罕、摩西和大卫的引用 这本书基本上有两种类型的文章，有一些必要的线条模糊，这部分也不例外。它首先包含一些主要是观察和数据收集的贡献，描述了deuterocanonical 作品的作者引用和利用犹太经典中的先行经典传统的各种方式。例如，Corley 的文章在 Tobit, Ben Sira, 1–2 Maccabees, Judith, Baruch, 912555 ITQ0010.1177/0021140020912555Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-reviews2020 中编录了对亚伯拉罕、摩西和大卫的引用 这本书基本上有两种类型的文章，有一些必要的线条模糊，这部分也不例外。它首先包含一些主要是观察和数据收集的贡献，描述了deuterocanonical 作品的作者引用和利用犹太经典中的先行经典传统的各种方式。例如，Corley 的文章在 Tobit, Ben Sira, 1–2 Maccabees, Judith, Baruch, 912555 ITQ0010.1177/0021140020912555Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-reviews2020 中编录了对亚伯拉罕、摩西和大卫的引用 描述了氘代正典著作的作者引用和利用犹太经典中的先行经典传统的各种方式。例如，Corley 的文章在 Tobit, Ben Sira, 1–2 Maccabees, Judith, Baruch, 912555 ITQ0010.1177/0021140020912555Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-reviews2020 中编录了对亚伯拉罕、摩西和大卫的引用 描述了氘代正典著作的作者引用和利用犹太经典中的先行经典传统的各种方式。例如，Corley 的文章在 Tobit, Ben Sira, 1–2 Maccabees, Judith, Baruch, 912555 ITQ0010.1177/0021140020912555Irish Theological QuarterlyBook Reviews book-reviews2020 中编录了对亚伯拉罕、摩西和大卫的引用