当前位置: X-MOL 学术International Organizations Law Review › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Substituting International Criminal Justice for an African Criminal Justice?
International Organizations Law Review ( IF 0.6 ) Pub Date : 2017-12-05 , DOI: 10.1163/15723747-01402003
Konstantinos D Magliveras 1
Affiliation  

This article examines the reasons and the grounds behind the antiparathesis between the African Union and several of its Member States, on the one hand, and international criminal justice and the International Criminal Court (‘ICC’), on the other hand. It also examines the consequences of and responses to this antiparathesis, including the creation of an International Criminal Law Section to the African Court of Justice and Human Rights and questions whether it offers any added value. The article concludes with suggesting the setting up of ICC regional/circuit chambers, each dealing with a specific continent/region, as a means to restructure the ICC, to make it more relevant to its users, namely the contracting parties to the Rome Statute, and to allay fears of politically motivated prosecutions.

中文翻译:

用国际刑事司法代替非洲刑事司法?

本文一方面考察了非洲联盟与其几个成员国之间的对立,另一方面考察了国际刑事司法和国际刑事法院 ('ICC') 之间的对立背后的原因和依据。它还审查了这种反义词的后果和回应,包括为非洲法院和人权法院设立一个国际刑法科,并质疑它是否提供任何附加价值。文章最后建议设立国际刑事法院区域/巡回分庭,每个分庭处理一个特定的大陆/地区,作为重组国际刑事法院的一种手段,使其与其用户更相关,即《罗马规约》的缔约方,并减轻对出于政治动机的起诉的恐惧。
更新日期:2017-12-05
down
wechat
bug