This paper aims to provide an account of the legal development concerning civilian right to pursue legal action against public authorities. Review includes historical recap of the state of law practiced prior to 1977 and the decision in the case of O’Reilly that forcefully limit individual’s right to bring action. Despite its blatant disregard of the relevant statute, the O’Reilly decision remains a valid precedent. The essay then considers subsequent law reform and the effect of the Human Rights Act 1998 in limiting the applicability of the O’Reilly principle. The essay aims to benefit law students and non-legal lay person.,The paper adopts a hermeneutics positivism approach in considering relevant case laws that is precedent to the matter under discussion. Thereupon, an interpretivism approach is applied to examine subsequent reforms and its impact on civilian right to seek justice.,Judicial exclusivity restrains right to seek justice, but is it not totally discredited due to public policy. UK membership in the EU is an obstacle to judicial sovereignty, but it is also an avenue to dilute exclusivity.,This paper is presented in a simple easy-to-understand form that enable lay-person to understand the current state of law in matters concerning public law violation by public authorities and avenues available to them.,The paper contributes to reinforce understanding on the conflict between common law and statute, and current state of law concerning individual’s right to access to the court of law in cases related to public laws and public authorities.

中文翻译：

---

针对公共当局的司法独占性：民事诉讼规则，奥赖利和人权

本文旨在提供有关民事权利针对公共当局提起诉讼的法律发展的说明。审查包括对1977年以前实行的法律状态的历史回顾，以及对O'Reilly案的决定，该决定有力地限制了个人提起诉讼的权利。尽管O'Reilly决定公然无视相关法规，但仍然是有效的先例。然后，本文考虑了随后的法律改革以及《 1998年人权法》在限制奥赖利原则的适用性方面的效果。本文旨在使法学院的学生和非法学界人士受益。本文采用诠释学实证主义方法来考虑相关案例法，这是所讨论问题的先例。于是，司法独占权限制了寻求正义的权利，但是由于公共政策的原因，它并不完全被抹黑。英国加入欧盟是司法主权的障碍，但也是稀释专有权的一种途径。本文以一种简单易懂的形式提出，使外行人员可以了解当前的法律状况关于公共当局违反公法的行为及其可获得的途径。本文有助于加深对普通法与成文法之间冲突的理解，以及关于个人在与公法有关的案件中诉诸法院的权利的法律现状和公共机构。司法排他性限制了寻求正义的权利，但是由于公共政策的原因，它并不完全被抹黑。英国加入欧盟是司法主权的障碍，但也是稀释专有权的一种途径。本文以一种简单易懂的形式提出，使外行人员可以了解当前的法律状况关于公共当局违反公法的行为及其可获得的途径。本文有助于加深对普通法与成文法之间冲突的理解，以及关于个人在与公法有关的案件中诉诸法院的权利的法律现状和公共当局。司法排他性限制了寻求正义的权利，但是由于公共政策的原因，它并不完全被抹黑。英国加入欧盟是司法主权的障碍，但也是稀释专有权的一种途径。本文以一种简单易懂的形式提出，使外行人员可以了解当前的法律状况有助于加强对普通法与成文法之间的冲突的理解，以及有关个人在与公法相关的案件中诉诸法院的权利的法律现状和公共机构。