The discussion highlights the need to distinguish between perceptions and the experiences implicated by perceptions, noting that Coliva’s framework makes perception irrelevant to justified belief, except for being the contingent means by which we are furnished with experiences that are the real source of justified belief. It then addresses two issues concerning the problem of cognitive locality. The problem concerns what enables us rationally to suppose that our perceptual experiences mostly put us in touch with reality. The issues addressed are: (1) whether, assuming that there is a problem of cognitive locality, Coliva’s Moderate position adequately addresses it; and (2) whether Coliva gives us enough to make sense of the claim, central to the Moderate position, that certain background presuppositions are constitutive of empirical rationality.

中文翻译：

---

论扩展理性

讨论强调了区分知觉和知觉所牵连的经验的必要性，并指出 Coliva 的框架使知觉与被证明的信念无关，除了作为我们获得作为被证明的信念的真正来源的经验的偶然手段。然后它解决了关于认知局部性问题的两个问题。问题在于什么使我们能够理性地假设我们的知觉经验主要使我们与现实接触。解决的问题是：（1）假设存在认知局部性问题，Coliva 的中等立场是否充分解决了这个问题；(2) Coliva 是否让我们足以理解温和立场的核心主张，即某些背景预设是经验理性的构成要素。