Replies are given to comments, questions, and objections to The Appearance of Ignorance. The reply to Robin McKenna focuses mainly on his questions of whether, with the skeptical argument I’m focused, a strong enough appearance of ignorance is generated to require an account of that appearance, and whether, to the extent that we do need to account for that appearance, we might do so without contextualism by adopting a solution proposed by Ernest Sosa. The reply to Michael Blome-Tillman focuses mainly on a counterexample he offers to my account of the operation of the “Rule of Sensitivity.” The reply to Elke Brendel focuses mainly on objections to contextualism from the phenomena of disagreement and retraction. The reply to Peter Baumann concerns several of his comments about my treatment of the Harman lottery puzzle.

中文翻译：

---

回复评论员

对《无知的外表》的评论、问题和反对意见给予答复。对罗宾·麦肯纳 (Robin McKenna) 的答复主要集中在他的问题上，即我所关注的怀疑论点是否会产生足够强烈的无知表象以需要对这种表象进行说明，以及是否需要说明对于这种外观，我们可能会采用欧内斯特·索萨 (Ernest Sosa) 提出的解决方案，而无需情境主义。对 Michael Blome-Tillman 的答复主要集中在他为我提供的关于“敏感性规则”运作的说明上的反例。对 Elke Brendel 的答复主要集中在对来自分歧和退缩现象的情境主义的反对。对 Peter Baumann 的回复涉及他对我对 Harman 彩票难题的处理的一些评论。