The evidential problem of evil involves a rarely discussed challenge, namely the challenge of defending theism against the hypothesis of a morally indifferent creator. Our argument uses a Bayesian framework and it starts by showing that if the only alternative to classical theism is naturalistic atheism, then fine-tuning can render theism virtually certain, even in the face of evil. But if the alternatives include the hypothesis of a morally indifferent creator, theism is defeated even if the fine-tuning premise is accepted. The resulting version of the evidential problem is unsolvable using the tools that are currently deployed by theists against evil.

中文翻译：

---

邪恶与冷漠之神

邪恶的证据问题涉及一个很少讨论的挑战，即捍卫有神论反对道德冷漠的创造者假设的挑战。我们的论点使用贝叶斯框架，它首先表明，如果古典有神论的唯一替代方案是自然主义无神论，那么即使面对邪恶，微调也可以使有神论几乎确定无疑。但是，如果替代方案包括道德冷漠的创造者的假设，即使接受微调前提，有神论也会被击败。使用目前由有神论者部署的对抗邪恶的工具，无法解决证据问题的最终版本。