The central idea of this paper is that Michel Foucault and Søren Kierkegaard are unexpected allies in the investigation into the relation between madness and reason. These thinkers criticize reason’s presumption of purity and call into question reason’s isolation from madness. Strategies of indirect communication and regard for paradox from Kierkegaard’s nineteenth-century works find new ground in Foucault’s twentieth-century archaeological undertaking as Foucault illuminates “both-and” moments in the history of madness, uncovering points where rationalism paradoxically conceives of madness or where madness is not unreasonable. Furthermore, for both thinkers, form and content meet, as Kierkegaard and Foucault’s occasionally “delirious lyricism” (in the phrase of Dominick LaCapra) exemplifies the intertwining of logical and illogical forces.

中文翻译：

---

福柯和克尔凯郭尔的疯狂之声

本文的中心思想是，米歇尔·福柯和索伦·克尔凯郭尔是研究疯狂与理性关系的意外盟友。这些思想家批评理性对纯洁性的假设，并质疑理性与疯狂的隔离。间接交流的策略和对克尔凯郭尔 19 世纪作品悖论的关注在福柯 20 世纪的考古事业中找到了新的基础，因为福柯阐明了疯狂历史中的“双向”时刻，揭示了理性主义自相矛盾地设想疯狂或疯狂的地方不是没有道理。此外，对于思想家来说，形式和内容相遇，因为克尔凯郭尔和福柯偶尔的“精神错乱的抒情”（用多米尼克·拉卡普拉（Dominick LaCapra）的话来说）体现了逻辑和非逻辑力量的交织。