Recent decades have witnessed a growing interest in narrative both in certain areas of philosophy and in the study of religion. The philosophy of religion has not itself been at the forefront of this narrative turn, but exceptions exist—most notably Eleonore Stump’s work on biblical stories and the problem of suffering. Characterizing Stump’s approach as an apologetic orientation, this article contrasts it with pluralistic orientations that, rather than seeking to defend religious faith, are concerned with doing conceptual justice to the range of possible human perspectives, both religious and nonreligious. By discussing various examples, the article makes a case for narrative philosophy of religion, especially in its pluralistic form.

中文翻译：

---

宗教叙事哲学：护教学和多元取向

近几十年来，在某些哲学领域和宗教研究中，人们对叙事越来越感兴趣。宗教哲学本身并未处于这种叙事转向的最前沿，但也存在例外情况——最著名的是埃莉奥诺尔·斯坦普 (Eleonore Stump) 关于圣经故事和苦难问题的著作。本文将 Stump 的方法描述为一种道歉取向，将其与多元取向进行对比，多元取向不是寻求捍卫宗教信仰，而是关注对可能的人类观点范围（宗教和非宗教）进行概念正义。通过讨论各种例子，文章为宗教的叙事哲学，特别是其多元形式提供了一个案例。