The article analyses and criticizes the concept of hybrid courts. The main proposition is that the concept of hybrid courts is unclear and that there are no clear criteria which would provide guidance for establishing if a judicial body is a hybrid court or not. The idea of hybrid courts is conceptually misleading because it creates the perception that hybrid courts are a separate institutional category different from international and domestic criminal courts. The author argues that the concept of hybrid courts should therefore be abandoned in favour of clearer criteria which distinguish between international and domestic courts. Analysing the Kosovo Specialist Chambers from this perspective, the author argues that the Kosovo Specialist Chambers are an international criminal court and not a domestic court which has legal implications, such as concerning immunity of heads of state.

中文翻译：

---

重新审视混合法庭的概念：科索沃专家法庭的案例

文章对混合法庭的概念进行了分析和批判。主要主张是混合法院的概念不明确，并且没有明确的标准可以为确定司法机构是否为混合法院提供指导。混合法院的想法在概念上具有误导性，因为它让人认为混合法院是一个与国际和国内刑事法院不同的独立机构类别。作者认为，因此应放弃混合法院的概念，转而采用更明确的标准来区分国际法院和国内法院。提交人从这个角度分析科索沃专家分庭，认为科索沃专家分庭是一个国际刑事法院，而不是一个具有法律影响的国内法院，