The Swedish government has decided that all research results in the form of research data and scientific publications financed with public funds should be openly accessible as far as possible. The question is whether the responsible actors and if the universities are ready to implement the change. The significance of open access has amplified in Sweden. Earlier research has brought to light that the collection and preservation of research data are often surrounded by ambiguous rules and lack a comprehensive structure. For example, archiving is not given enough consideration in connection to research projects and researchers often tend to save their material on platforms that are not persistent over time. This article is based upon a qualitative research approach where 15 semi-structured interviews have been used as primarily data sources to investigate the implementation of open access of research data and scientific publications. The article investigated how Swedish universities and public authorities were working with archiving and implementation of open research data and their opinions on open access. The results displayed a lack of coordination, resources and infrastructure but also that common agreed nomenclature were missing. The management of research data was not part of an overall recordkeeping strategy. One explanation could be differences in the information culture among researchers and archivists. Social sciences theory has been combined with archival theory in order to explain the reasons to this. These have been put in relation to the principles of the open data directive.

中文翻译：

---

开放研究数据，档案挑战？

瑞典政府已决定，应尽可能公开获取以公共数据资助的研究数据和科学出版物形式的所有研究成果。问题是负责任的行为者以及大学是否准备好实施变革。开放获取的重要性在瑞典得到了扩大。早期的研究表明，研究数据的收集和保存经常被模棱两可的规则所包围，并且缺乏全面的结构。例如，与研究项目有关的归档没有得到足够的考虑，研究人员通常倾向于将其材料保存在不会随时间推移而持久的平台上。本文基于定性研究方法，其中以15个半结构化访谈作为主要数据来源，以调查研究数据和科学出版物的开放获取的实施情况。这篇文章调查了瑞典大学和公共机构如何对开放研究数据及其对开放获取的意见进行归档和实施。结果表明缺乏协调，资源和基础设施，但是缺少通用的术语。研究数据的管理不是整体记录保存策略的一部分。一种解释可能是研究人员和档案管理员之间的信息文化差异。社会科学理论已经与档案理论相结合，以解释其原因。