This article analyses the choice of law issues associated with setting aside an arbitral award under the Egyptian Arbitration Code (the Code), the challenges posed by applying the Code to arbitration conducted outside Egypt, and the lack of a clear criterion to define the Code’s scope of application. Choice of law issues – such as the law governing the parties’ capacity, the law governing the agreement to arbitrate and the applicable curial – are not addressed by defined choice of law rules. Under Egyptian law, there are several conflicting choices of rules. Finally, the article focuses on the Egyptian courts’ tendency to apply Egyptian law extraterritorially, either to protect Egyptian public policy or to apply Egyptian mandatory rules to determine the procedural validity of the arbitral award and the arbitration proceedings in general.

中文翻译：

---

根据埃及仲裁法撤销仲裁裁决的理由：未解决的法律问题选择和不受欢迎的治外法权

本文分析了与根据《埃及仲裁法典》（《法典》）撤销仲裁裁决相关的法律选择问题、将《法典》适用于在埃及境外进行的仲裁所带来的挑战，以及缺乏明确的标准来界定《埃及仲裁法典》的范围的应用。法律选择问题——例如管辖当事人行为能力的法律、管辖仲裁协议的法律和适用的法庭——未由明确的法律选择规则解决。根据埃及法律，有几种相互冲突的规则选择。最后，本文重点关注埃及法院倾向于在域外适用埃及法律，以保护埃及公共政策或适用埃及强制性规则来确定仲裁裁决和一般仲裁程序的程序有效性。