The article is dedicated to the application questions of a case study method known as casuistry. In its long tradition, it focuses on an influential variant of the early modern period and reconstructs its functionality. In the course of reading recent receptions, it is noted that some studies speak of a “casuistic revival” in moral case deliberation in health care. As a result of this revival, casuistry has been modified in such a way that it guides case discussions in practice with the help of a tripartite methodology (morphology, taxonomy, and kinetics). However, as it turns out, casuistry, a case comparison method of ethical judgement based on reasoning logic, is less suitable for moral case deliberations in direct patient care. This stems from the fact that casuistry is a detailed procedure of ethical learning beneficial to institutionalized ethics committees or similar forms of ethics consultation in health care.

中文翻译：

---

Casuistry：关于病人护理中的伦理判断方法

这篇文章致力于解决被称为 casuistry 的案例研究方法的应用问题。在其悠久的传统中，它专注于早期现代时期的一个有影响力的变体并重建其功能。在阅读最近的招待会的过程中，注意到一些研究谈到卫生保健中道德案例审议中的“诡辩复兴”。作为这次复兴的结果，诡辩术已被修改为在三方方法（形态学、分类学和动力学）的帮助下指导实践中的案例讨论。然而，事实证明，诡辩术是一种基于推理逻辑的伦理判断案例比较方法，不太适合直接患者护理中的道德案例审议。