Secular–religious dichotomy has been criticised in discourse on secularisation theory as well as in discussions of the relationship between secular and religious feminism. Feminist theorists have criticised the secular–religious divide of feminism for overlooking facts such as the inherent gendering of this dichotomy, the participation of women believers in the gender equality movement since its inception, and the contributions of feminist theologians and gender studies scholars who use their respective religious traditions as a basis for gender egalitarianism. This article will criticise secular–religious dichotomy for overlooking the fact that secular, rather than religious, principles underlie gender stereotypes. Namely, Christian and Islamic theological anthropology has accepted philosophical postulates regarding the nature of women and used them to build models of subordination and complementarity of gender relations, thereby neglecting the egalitarian anthropology that can be developed based on the holy scriptures of both traditions. One of the challenges in exploring the secular-religious dichotomy can be found in the anti-gender movement in which believers join secular organizations and use secular discourse to advocate and preserve gender stereotypes.

中文翻译：

---

宗教世俗化是宗教性别刻板印象的来源

世俗-宗教二分法在世俗化理论的论述以及世俗和宗教女权主义之间的关系的讨论中受到批评。女权主义理论家批评女权主义的世俗 - 宗教分歧，因为他们忽视了一些事实，例如这种二分法的固有性别，女性信徒自性别平等运动开始以来就参与其中，以及女权主义神学家和性别研究学者的贡献。各自的宗教传统作为性别平等主义的基础。本文将批评世俗-宗教二分法，因为它忽视了一个事实，即世俗而非宗教原则是性别刻板印象的基础。即，基督教和伊斯兰神学人类学已经接受了关于女性本性的哲学假设，并用它们来建立性别关系的从属和互补模式，从而忽视了可以基于两种传统的圣经发展起来的平等主义人类学。探索世俗宗教二分法的挑战之一可以在反性别运动中找到，在这种运动中，信徒加入世俗组织并使用世俗话语来倡导和维护性别刻板印象。