The study examines Hungarian historiography since the Hungarian democratic transformation. Its main question is how Hungarian history writing was able to reformulate itself during the short period after 1989. In academic and public discourse one can observe parallel processes of de-ideologization and re-ideologization towards a one-sided commitment to the national(istic) viewpoint. The study starts by setting the general scene and examining the politics of memory within the fields of general focus, i.e., the discourses of memory politics and institutions. Afterwards, it discusses two focal themes in greater detail: 1956 and the Kadar era on one hand, and the Horthy era on the other. The discussion follows the order in which these themes emerged in the discourse. It also contains a short overview of the memory politics linked to the given theme as well as the various currents in history writing, narrating and interpreting these important issues of the national historical canon.

中文翻译：

---

1989年后匈牙利当代史话语

该研究考察了自匈牙利民主转型以来的匈牙利史学。它的主要问题是匈牙利历史写作如何能够在 1989 年之后的短时间内重新表述自己。在学术和公共话语中，人们可以观察到去意识形态化和重新意识形态化的平行过程，以实现对民族（主义）的片面承诺。观点。该研究首先设置一般场景并在一般焦点领域内检查记忆政治，即记忆政治和制度的话语。随后，它更详细地讨论了两个焦点主题：一方面是 1956 年和卡达尔时代，另一方面是霍尔蒂时代。讨论遵循这些主题在话语中出现的顺序。