This article examines whether the implementation of the EU's Mediterranean policies has been unsuccessful due to the incoherence of these policies. Termed as incompatibility of goals among the EMP, the ENP and the UFM, incoherence is analysed in various subfields of the EU's external action, namely in the functional external dimensions of internal policies (Justice and Home Affairs/JHA, Energy, Transport, Environment and Education) and external relations (Trade) on one side, and in Foreign Policy on the other. Functional subfields prove to retain more coherence and higher implementation success, with Education being exemplary. Conversely, political subfields (democratization and respect for human rights) expose incoherence and consequently about 50% failure of implementation. Nevertheless, in JHA (the fight against irregular immigration and terrorism), where the former functional cooperation became highly politically burdened, results show even higher non-implementation, which bears more general relevance for EU external action policy-making.

中文翻译：

---

欧盟地中海政策的（一致性）：分析对实施成功的影响

本文探讨了由于这些政策的不连贯性，欧盟的地中海政策的实施是否未成功。被称为EMP，ENP和UFM之间的目标不相容，在欧盟外部行动的各个子领域，即内部政策的职能外部维度（司法和内政/ JHA，能源，运输，环境和社会政策）中，分析了不一致性。教育）和对外关系（贸易）在一方面，而外交政策则在另一方面。实践证明，功能子领域可以保持更高的连贯性和更高的实施成功率，其中教育就是榜样。相反，政治领域（民主化和对人权的尊重）暴露了不连贯性，因此导致执行失败约50％。尽管如此，