Vol. 34, No. 3, September 2017 and Aristotle to understand (and Replace?) The Business Judgment Rule” while Christina Lupton also appeals to philosophy in “Walking on Flowers: the Kantian Aesthetics of Hard Times.” Where would our critics be without the dividing colon? Theodore Dalrymple tells his readers that his piece was first given to his students in North Korea. He has obviously survived the experience, and we hope his listeners did too. This compilation thus contains a well-chosen and varied range of material, historical, contextual and innovative, with which to approach Dickens’s novel. It would be fair to say that the contextual material outweighs the more conventionally literary critical; indeed the volume contains very little traditionally critical commentary of the novel. But that to some extent is of the nature of the novel itself and perhaps also of developments within the critical function. There is great variety here, and who these days can rely on simple explication du texte alone?

中文翻译：

---

令人不安的狄更斯：过程、进步和变化编辑。作者：Christine Huguet 和 Paul Vita

卷。34, No. 3, September 2017 and Aristotle to understand (and Replace?) The Business Judgment Rule”，而 Christina Lupton 在“Walking on Flowers: the Kantian Aesthetics of Hard Times”中也诉诸哲学。如果没有分号，我们的批评者会在哪里？Theodore Dalrymple 告诉他的读者，他的作品最初是送给他在朝鲜的学生的。他显然在这次经历中幸存下来，我们希望他的听众也能做到。因此，该汇编包含精心挑选的各种材料、历史、背景和创新，可用来接近狄更斯的小说。可以公平地说，上下文材料胜过更传统的文学批评。事实上，这本书几乎没有对小说进行传统的批判性评论。但这在某种程度上是小说本身的性质，也可能是批判功能内的发展。这里种类繁多，如今谁能仅依靠简单的文字解释？