Humour has been a surprisingly neglected topic in philosophy. However, Noah Greenstein has recently given an intuitive schema for modelling the logical structure of puns. Having this logical structure is indeed what makes a pun punny, but I argue that it is not what makes a pun funny. In order for a pun to be funny, the components comprising its logical structure must be related to one another such that certain conditions are satisfied. By using Graeme Ritchie's linguistic model of jokes, I give these conditions in terms of those components.

中文翻译：

---

有趣的双关逻辑

幽默一直是哲学中一个令人惊讶的被忽视的话题。然而，诺亚格林斯坦最近给出了一个直观的模式来模拟双关语的逻辑结构。拥有这种逻辑结构确实使双关语成为双关语，但我认为这并不是使双关语变得有趣的原因。为了使双关语有趣，构成其逻辑结构的组件必须彼此相关，以满足某些条件。通过使用格雷姆·里奇 (Graeme Ritchie) 的笑话语言模型，我根据这些成分给出了这些条件。