Non-Humean accounts of lawhood are said to founder on the Inference Problem, which is the problem of saying how laws that go beyond the regularities can entail the regularities. I argue that the Inference Problem has a simple solution – the Axiomatic Solution – on which the non-Humean only needs to outfit her laws with a law-to-regularity axiom. There is a remaining Epistemic Bulge, as to why one should believe that the posit-so-axiomatized is to be found in nature, but the non-Humean can flatten the bulge. Lawhood serves as a case study of how fundamental posits can do their business.

中文翻译：

---

治理是法律事务

非休谟式的法律解释被认为是推理问题的奠基人，这个问题是说明超越规律的法律如何能够包含规律的问题。我认为推理问题有一个简单的解决方案 - 公理解决方案 - 非人类只需要为她的法律配备一个法律到正则性公理。还有一个认识论凸起，至于为什么人们应该相信假设如此公理化是在自然界中发现的，但非人类可以压平凸起。Lawhood 作为一个案例研究，说明基本假设如何开展业务。