The Problem As a result of the domination of U.S.- and U.K.-centric approaches to human resource development (HRD), current academic practices often reside in ethnocentric content-related silos, which include certain theoretical frameworks, models, mindsets, and ways of conceptualizing. Given the exponential increase in globalization and the complex global issues facing the field of HRD, these teaching and research practices as well as the limited HRD global and transdisciplinary networks cannot offer the needed solutions to the problems faced by professionals around the world in their workplaces, communities, and societies. The Solution To understand this problem empirically and recommend solutions based on our findings, we reviewed journal articles published in the last year in our four Academy of Human Resource Development (AHRD)-sponsored journals and HRD programs of universities that are members of AHRD’s Program Excellence Network (PEN) and University Forum for Human Resource Development (UFHRD) to understand the state of globalization of HRD research and teaching. We offer recommendations for HRD scholars representing the new guard to globalize their teaching and research and professional associations to guide and support the globalization of HRD academic practice. The Stakeholders This article is of particular interest to HRD scholars in all stages of their careers seeking to globalize their academic practice and contribute to their own and their learners’ global mindset development and to professional associations guiding and supporting the globalization of HRD academic practice.

中文翻译：

---

全球化的人力资源开发学术实践：发展教学和研究的全球思路

问题由于以美国和英国为中心的人力资源开发方法（HRD）的支配，当前的学术实践通常存在于以民族为中心的内容相关的筒仓中，其中包括某些理论框架，模型，思维方式和概念化方式。鉴于全球化的指数级增长和人力资源开发领域面临的复杂的全球性问题，这些教学和研究实践以及有限的人力资源开发全球和跨学科网络无法为世界各地的专业人员在工作场所面临的问题提供所需的解决方案，社区和社会。解决方案要凭经验理解此问题并根据我们的发现推荐解决方案，我们审查了去年在人力资源开发学院（AHRD）赞助的四种期刊和AHRD计划卓越网络（PEN）和大学人力资源开发论坛（UFHRD）成员大学的HRD计划中发表的期刊文章，了解HRD研究和教学的全球化状况。我们为代表新警卫的HRD学者提供建议，以使其教学和研究全球化，并成立专业协会，以指导和支持HRD学术实践的全球化。