当前位置: X-MOL 学术Critical Research on Religion › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Judgment and critique, anthropology and religion
Critical Research on Religion Pub Date : 2018-04-01 , DOI: 10.1177/2050303218757325
Jon Bialecki 1
Affiliation  

This article attempts to chart the various cross-cutting forms of critique that might surface in an ethnographic investigation of modes of religiosity. It stresses that if ethnography is to be an actual encounter, then it is important to at once understand that critique itself is not limited to merely one form of expression; nor should there be preconceptions as to what subjects are capable of voicing critique. At the same time though, it is equally important to distinguish critique from judgment; the latter can be distinguished from critique in that judgment is a ratification of an already extant metric, category, sensitivity, or esthetic, rather than an open-ended, empirical, and potentially transformative rendezvous with difference.

中文翻译:

判断与批判、人类学与宗教

本文试图以图表批判的各种交叉的形式,在宗教的模式的人种学调查威力表面。它强调,如果人种是为一个实际相遇,那么它是在一次理解批判本身不限于仅仅是一个形式表达的重要; 也不应该有先入之见,什么科目是能够代言批判。与此同时,虽然,它从判断区分批判是非常重要的; 后者可以从在判断批判来区分是一个批准一个已经现存度量,类别,灵敏度,或审美的,而不是一个开放式的,经验,并且潜在地变革会合差。
更新日期:2018-04-01
down
wechat
bug