In her newest book, Alex Sharpe makes a persuasive case against the bringing of sexual offence prosecutions on the basis of “gender identity fraud”. Adopting a perspective in which queer and gender non-conforming identities are acknowledged and centred rather than doubted and dissected, Sharpe aims to destabilise the conceptual foundations upon which such prosecutions depend. In this review I place Sharpe’s contribution in its legal context, and offer an overview of her argument along with some reservations.

中文翻译：

---

亚历克斯·夏普 (Alex Sharpe) 的性亲密和性别认同“欺诈”回顾：重新构建法律和道德辩论（Routledge 2019；ISBN：978-0-367-28024-6）

在她的新书中，亚历克斯·夏普 (Alex Sharpe) 提出了一个有说服力的案例，反对以“性别身份欺诈”为由提起性犯罪诉讼。Sharpe 采用了一种承认和集中而非怀疑和剖析酷儿和性别不符合身份的观点，旨在破坏此类起诉所依赖的概念基础。在这篇评论中，我将夏普的贡献置于其法律背景中，并概述了她的论点以及一些保留意见。