The claim implicit in the title of the Synopsis purioris theologiae is that there is a difference between the theological disputations at Leiden conducted before the Synod of Dordt and those conducted after it. This essay examines various possibilities for the nature and extent of this difference. After comparing the disputations with regard to large thematic elements, overall structure, and specific theological topics, it appears that the differences between the two sets of disputations are not as great as might be expected. One must go to hotly debated topics to find differences in the disputations. The Leiden theological handbooks that resulted from the cycles of disputations could, before Dordt, be inconsistent or even incoherent due to the theological diversity within the faculty. What was “purer” after Dordt was a faculty that, on the contested questions of the synod, was uniform in its teaching, a consistency reflected in its theological handbook.

中文翻译：

---

《剧情简介》（Theiosis Purioris Theologiae，1625年）多少钱？

“提纲提纲”的标题中隐含的主张是，在多德主教会议之前和之后发生的在莱顿的神学争论之间存在差异。本文探讨了这种差异的性质和程度的各种可能性。在比较了有关大型主题要素，总体结构和特定神学主题的争论之后，似乎两组争论之间的差异并不像预期的那样大。必须去讨论激烈的话题，以找到分歧。由于教师内部神学的多样性，在争辩周期之后产生的莱顿神学手册可能前后不一致，甚至不一致。在多特（Dordt）大学之后，什么才是“纯粹”的，