The twelve-year Truce in the Dutch Revolt occasioned the clash between a liberal Reformed faction, known as Remonstrants, and the orthodox, known as Counter-Remonstrants. After the Synod of Dordt sealed the orthodox victory, the polemic between the two sides on doctrine and the limits of tolerance, first conducted in a pamphlet war, found its culmination in three major church histories: the Remonstrant Uytenbogaert produced the first vernacular church history which anchored the Remonstrant position firmly in the past; he was refuted almost page-by-page by the orthodox Trigland; and finally Brandt published his irenic four-volume History of the Reformation . This study analyzes this marshalling of Clio 1 for their cause by the Remonstrants, and the counterarguments used by the orthodox.

中文翻译：

---

克里奥的阿森纳

荷兰起义长达十二年的休战导致了一个自由派的改革派（被称为“示威者”）和东正教派（被称为“反示威”）之间的冲突。多德主教会议结束了东正教的胜利之后，双方在教义和容忍范围之间的争执首先在一次小册子战争中进行，并在三个主要的教堂历史上达到了顶峰：示威者维滕博格特（Uytenbogaert）产生了第一个白话教堂历史，过去坚定地定位了示威者的立场；东正教特里格兰德几乎逐页驳斥了他；最后勃兰特出版了他的革命性的四卷《改革史》。这项研究分析了Clio 1的编组原因，原因是抗议者和正统派使用了反对派。