The article argues for a re-assessment of the widespread assumption that Friedrich Breckling should be considered the editor of the 1687/90 German edition of the works of the sixteenth-century “Familist” author Hiel. After discussing the evidence which had seemed to point towards such a role for Breckling, the article draws on unedited material to demonstrate that the Hiel edition should instead be ascribed to Loth Fischer. This sheds new light on the religious and intellectual attitudes of the heterodox Lutheran theologian Breckling. When compared to his contemporary Gottfried Arnold, Breckling not only questioned the contemporary boundaries of orthodoxy, but also re-negotiated them, integrating elements from older heterodox traditions.

中文翻译：

---

扩展正统的边界？

文章主张重新评估普遍的假设，即应该认为弗里德里希·布雷克林应被视为16世纪“家族主义者”作家希尔的作品的1687/90德文版的编辑。在讨论了似乎暗示了布雷克林起这种作用的证据之后，本文引用了未经编辑的材料来证明应将Hiel版归因于Loth Fischer。这为路德教的异教神学家布雷克林的宗教和思想态度提供了新的启示。与他当代的戈特弗里德·阿诺德（Gottfried Arnold）相比，布雷克林不仅质疑正统的当代界限，而且还重新谈判了这些界限，融合了旧的异教徒传统的元素。