Debates about global distributive justice focus on the gulf between the wealthy North and the impoverished South, rather than on issues arising between liberal democracies. A review of John Rawls’s approach to international justice discloses a step Rawls skipped in his extension of his original-position procedure. The skipped step is where a need for the distributional autonomy of sovereign liberal states reveals itself. Neoliberalism denies the possibility and the desirability of distributional autonomy. A complete Rawlsian account of global justice shows the necessity and possibility of a charter between liberal states, assuring each a proper minimum degree of distributional autonomy

中文翻译：

---

新自由主义与分配自治：罗尔斯《万民法》中的跳过步骤

关于全球分配正义的辩论集中在富裕的北方和贫困的南方之间的鸿沟，而不是自由民主国家之间出现的问题。对约翰·罗尔斯的国际正义方法的回顾揭示了罗尔斯在扩展他的原始职位程序时跳过了一个步骤。跳过的步骤是主权自由国家的分配自治的需要暴露出来的地方。新自由主义否认分配自治的可能性和可取性。对全球正义的完整罗尔斯式解释表明，自由国家之间建立宪章的必要性和可能性，确保每个国家都有适当的最低程度的分配自治