The judgement that provides the content of intention and coincides with the conclusion of practical reasoning is a normative judgement about what to do, and not, as Anscombe and McDowell argue, a factual judgement about what one is doing. Treating the conclusion of practical reasoning as expressing a recommendation rather than a verdict undermines McDowell’s argument; the special nature of practical reasoning does not preclude its conclusions being normative. Anscombe’s and McDowell’s claim that practical self-knowledge is productive of action may be accommodated by identifying the content of practical knowledge not with the conclusion but with a premise of practical reasoning – a kind of practical reasoning that occurs within rather than before action.

中文翻译：

---

实用推理和实用知识

提供意图内容并与实践推理结论相一致的判断是关于做什么的规范性判断，而不是像安斯康姆和麦克道尔所说的那样，是对一个人正在做什么的事实判断。将实际推理的结论视为表达建议而不是裁决，这会破坏麦克道尔的论点；实践推理的特殊性并不排除其结论具有规范性。Anscombe 和 McDowell 的主张，即实践的自我知识是行动的产物，可以通过将实践知识的内容识别为实践推理的前提而不是结论——一种发生在行动之内而不是行动之前的实践推理来适应。