Can appealing to children’s rights help to solve the non-identity problem in cases of procreation? A number of philosophers have answered affirmatively, arguing that even if children cannot be harmed by being born into disadvantaged conditions, they may nevertheless be wronged if those conditions fail to meet a minimal standard of decency to which all children are putatively entitled. This paper defends the tenability of this view by outlining and responding to five prominent objections that have been raised against it in the contemporary literature: (1) the identifiability objection; (2) the non-existence objection; (3) the waiving of rights objection, (4) the lack of legitimate complaint objection; and (5) the unfairness objection.

中文翻译：

---

儿童权利和非身份问题

诉诸儿童权利是否有助于解决生育案件中的非身份问题？一些哲学家的回答是肯定的，他们认为即使孩子出生在不利的条件下不会受到伤害，但如果这些条件不符合所有儿童假定的最低体面标准，他们仍然可能受到冤屈。本文通过概述和回应当代文献中针对它提出的五个突出反对意见来捍卫这一观点的成立性：（1）可识别性反对意见；（二）不存在异议；（三）放弃权利异议， （四）申诉异议不合法的；（五）不公平性异议。