Most of Spinoza’s arguments for God’s existence do not rely on any special feature of God, but instead on merely general features of substance. This raises the following worry: those arguments prove the existence of non-divine substances just as much as they prove God’s existence, and yet there is not enough room in Spinoza’s system for all these substances. I argue that Spinoza attempts to solve this problem by using a principle of plenitude to rule out the existence of other substances and that the principle cannot be derived from the PSR, as many claim.Abbreviation: PSR: Principle of Sufficient Reason

中文翻译：

---

斯宾诺莎和其他物质的问题

大多数斯宾诺莎关于上帝存在的论证并不依赖于上帝的任何特殊特征，而只是依赖于实体的一般特征。这引起了以下担忧：这些论点证明了非神圣实体的存在，就像它们证明了上帝的存在一样，但斯宾诺莎的体系中没有足够的空间容纳所有这些实体。我认为斯宾诺莎试图通过使用充足原则来排除其他物质的存在来解决这个问题，并且正如许多人声称的那样，该原则不能从 PSR 推导出来。缩写：PSR：充分理由原则