Studio teaching is a long standing tradition and a signature pedagogy across a broad range of art and creative disciplines, from arts to architecture and design. However, the practice of studio teaching varies across disciplines and practitioners. Do these variances indicate different signature pedagogies in the creative disciplines? An exploratory study was conducted to examine how studio teaching is practised at a Faculty of Creative Industries in Australia, and whether those studio practices suggest distinctive signature pedagogies and creative transfer. In this article, we describe the study and offer insights into studio teaching practices in the creative industries disciplines. We argue that nuances and differences among studio practices in creative industries reveal different signature pedagogies. Our findings offer a unique lens on current approaches to creative disciplines education, where interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches to teaching are encouraged in order to support and prepare a highly educated and flexible future workforce.

中文翻译：

---

来自澳大利亚创意产业学院的工作室教学实践的见解

工作室教学是一个长期的传统，是涵盖从艺术到建筑和设计的各种艺术和创意学科的标志性教学法。但是，工作室教学的实践因学科和实践者而异。这些差异是否表示创意学科中的签名教学法不同？进行了一项探索性研究，以研究澳大利亚创意产业学院如何进行工作室教学，以及这些工作室实践是否暗示了独特的签名教学法和创意转移。在本文中，我们描述了这项研究，并提供了对创意产业学科中工作室教学实践的见解。我们认为创意产业中工作室实践之间的细微差别和差异揭示了不同的签名教学法。