This article notes that while there is a large literature lamenting increasing assaults on academic freedom, there is little literature to address ways in which it might be preserved. Sampling that writing, it finds some concern with protecting academic freedom in extreme scenarios, via discrete programmes, and generalised dissidence, but no discussion of determinate action applicable to all Arts and Humanities research. Defining academic freedom via the UK’s legal framework and elaboration in Judith Butler’s writing, the article inventorises significant assaults in recent times, noting the roles of government and the market in such. Following the literature review, it proposes a new, interventionist tactic for preserving academic freedom, suggesting that undue constraints should be annotated when research is written up, and that this space should also be used to suggest constructive alternatives. This strategy is demonstrated as the article acknowledges some of the constraints on its own production and suggests redress.

中文翻译：

---

捍卫学术自由：艺术和人文学科研究受限制

本文指出，尽管有大量文献对学术自由的攻击日益增加感到悲哀，但很少有文献讨论保留这种自由的方式。对该著作进行抽样调查，发现有人担心在极端情况下通过离散程序和普遍异议来保护学术自由，但没有讨论适用于所有艺术和人文研究的决定性行动。该文章通过英国的法律框架定义了学术自由，并在朱迪思·巴特勒（Judith Butler）的著作中进行了详细阐述，清点了近期的重大袭击事件，并指出了政府和市场在其中的作用。在对文献进行回顾之后，它提出了一种新的干预主义策略来维护学术自由，并建议在撰写研究报告时应注明不适当的限制，并且该空间也应用于建议建设性的替代方案。当文章承认其自身生产的某些限制并建议纠正措施时，就证明了这种策略。